Jump To Navigation

Constitutional Law

Indianapolis Attorneys: Constitutional Law / Election Law

Hoover Hull LLP represents clients whose cases involve issues of constitutional law. We have litigated constitutional matters in state and federal courts and before administrative agencies. We represent candidates for election, election boards and election officials in election recounts in voting law disputes and other matters involving the constitutionality of election laws.

To contact us, click here or call 317-822-4400

Our constitutional law division is headed by John David Hoover, a founding partner at Hoover Hull LLP who has thirty years of litigation experience and is AV® rated* under Martindale-Hubbell's peer review rating system. While constitutional law disputes arise most frequently concerning election disputes, Mr. Hoover has also published on the constitutionality of laws including limitations of damages under the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act.

Before creating Hoover Hull LLP, our founding partners led the litigation department of a large Indianapolis law firm. Today, they head their own boutique firm that strives to consistently deliver excellent client service. In every case, we seek to attain results that exceed our clients' expectations.

We offer a talented legal team dedicated to personalized service. Our clients work closely with the team assigned to handle their case. We make every effort to maintain a consistent team on your case. Clients are also able to have as much input into the handling of their legal disputes as they feel comfortable with.

If you have a constitutional challenge in any case, contact the lawyers at Hoover Hull LLP online or by calling 317-822-4400 to schedule an appointment.

*CV, BV and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies.

Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.